This, unironically. 40% of the population is creative to some degree. Intellectual property law exists to monopolise the intellectual capital that creative types produce. The constant expansion of IP law has the goal of monetising the exercise of a fundamental necessary impulse.https://twitter.com/BeigeShiba/status/1222842420372488192 …
Will never get tired of tweeting this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.11236.pdf … Creativity literally cannot not be!