YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
using dogwhistles and euphemism as a loophole in the TOS is still expressing prohibited speech (hate speech, etc), just obfuscating that that's what's happening. it's less like "intending to commit a crime" and more "getting away with breaking the rules by being a pedant"
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.