Correction : à la Versailles.
-
-
-
I block nitpickers
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
1- It's an effort. It may be flawed. It may fall short. It may be worse than all that came before it. But please point to a single instance since November 1947 where the Arabs (from the Arabs of British Mandate Palestine then, to the Palestinians now) indicated (NOT said) "Yes"!!
-
Agree. At least it indicates that the US expects both parties to behave the same way (no indiscriminate attacks on civilians) and the end state could be viable. Wiser Palestinians could go with it. The
#EU Won't.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How many ‘Palestinian refugees ‘ were there in 1940?
-
I block sophistry.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This tweet is also not about the peace plan ...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What's next ? "Water is wet" ? America is working for Israel of course they wont help palestinians in any way
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Straight from “The Art of the Deal”: “My style of deal-making is quite simple and straightforward. I aim very high, and then I just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what I’m after.” Trump understands the anchoring effect.pic.twitter.com/oLRVnMmQGT
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.