They took health into account, but it's self reported:https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6377 …
-
-
-
Yes I looked@at control. Insurance companies know their shit.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They aren't that stupid: "The researchers combed through the data they had collected to search for patterns. They said their findings suggested, but did not prove, that participating in the arts could lead to a longer life span."
-
You mean they hedged their claim to make it a nonclaim?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Same thing here: simple correlation between museum visits and higher socioeconomic status and thus health.pic.twitter.com/wCPZNez3E8
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
That's called a confounding variable. Any self respecting decent statistician or surveyist is committing fraud if they do not know what a confounding variable is and report an association like this that was not controlled for.
-
They claim they controlled...but didn't
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
you mean that people going to museums would anticipate having to stand and walk for over two hours there, without proper authorities telling them to???
-
Quite more about income levels and location Mr. Ponzetto. Someone living near Boston Commons more likely to easily go to MFA.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@nntaleb This is exactly the type of mistakes which are avoided when using Judea Pearl's "Causal" statistics. The diagrams and the way to deal with hypotheses enforce that we don't get fooled by randomness in this way!Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.