Principle 11: No public institution or agency should be created without an expiration date.pic.twitter.com/xlVD1RrYvD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Principle 11: No public institution or agency should be created without an expiration date.pic.twitter.com/xlVD1RrYvD
Note: When Arabo-Sunni-Islamists want to smear the LOCALISTS & minorities who want bottom-up self-determination, s.a. Christians, Shiites & oth minorities they use tags such as "right wing", "sectarian", "fascist", etc.
(Look at behavior of low-IQ fraud-propagandist @shadihamid)
The division in politics can be summarized as between + Embedded, complexity-minded, multiscale/fractal localists (politics as an ecology/complex adaptive system) + Abstract one-dimensional universalists & monoculturalists (politics as a top-down engineering project)
Can 3 and 5 be merged as "assymetric survival mechanisms produce fractal clustering." or I'm I missing something?
Yes but markets better this way. Those who get one point in a snap will transfer to the other.
Number 10 is illogical. Gains and losses from politics are examples of real SITG. For every Obama and Gore, there is a reviled GWB 43 or John Major. Do you mean that 'losses' from political infamy also belong to the taxpayer?
Gore, Obama, et al., are merely examples, the point is that they should forfeit that gain or be barred from earning it, otherwise the post-"public service" gain is an incentive to "serve" that deviates from proper public goals.
So, how does a democratic society go about barring them ... given that, apparently everyone who has served enjoys this earnings boom? Ideas should be S.M.A.R.T. and internally consistent. How do we "stop" them, without discouraging service.
And not only that: the post-public-service benefits are an incentive that strengthens American and British democracy. Everyone does their best and looks forward to retirement. Compare to the Third World, without such incentives. Presidents hang on to power forever.
Everyone motivated by greed, power, fame, peer pressure, sense of community and idealism may do their best to get into government. But considering infamy and mere access to high connections are profitable, only those motivated by the latter three will continue to "do their best."
As complexity grows at a rate faster than our ability to understand and even recognise it, opportunities for cognitive dissonance render all your arguments inaccessible by the people who would benefit from reading them. Is there a political 'responsibility' to involve them?
If the people being governed want to maintain a modern democracy, yes. If there is the desire to be a DINO (democracy in name only), then no.
Hmmm Thing is with the increasing understanding and use of the power of 'persuasion' methods and algorithms It's hard for people to KNOW what THEY want
I think that people find it easy to know what they want. What is difficult is identifying if what candidates are offering will meet their needs. These persuasion methods and algorithms make that very difficult, due to their complexity.
Come on, you could at least try to appear a little less biased and cite guys like Bush or Cheney in your principle 10.
How did Bush and Cheney profit from politics? They divested themselves of their oil interests before taking office.
Lolmao have you ever heard of Halliburton? Dick Cheney become its CEO with zero business experience just after leaving the DOD in 95. 15 years and 700,000 deaths later he was worth 9 figures.
As for the Bush clan, they have profited from wars for decades. Check Carlyle Group, Winston Partners, ESS... It's orders of magnitude morally worse and financially profitable that Obama's shady book deals or speaking fees.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.