stability-cucks never learn
-
-
certainly not, what i'm saying is that there is a bias in favor of collapse, because the more ordinary forms of change strain the imagination and are interestingly more uncomfortable than thinking about getting to eat your boss
-
i think we can talk about collapse independently of specific geopolitical events that we recognize as such, we generally privilege our geopolitical models to the deficit of other ones
-
not what i was getting at: imagining a violent death is easier, and to some more comforting, than imagining growing old among gradually shifting iterations of *this*, collapse cult an attempt at mental homeostasis
-
no i know what you are saying, and i know that’s what morphine is attaq, i am just finding a possible related point of agreement
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.