given that being a woman is strictly elective, how would your policy work in practice — wouldn’t all men now have a financial incentive to just be ‘formally’ women to receive the benefit
-
-
Replying to @nmgrm
Reverse jizya tax. Some guys will become women it's fine they'll be out of the gene pool and shouldn't be procreating anyways. Small price to pay for a gigantic revolution in parenting and families
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @PaulSkallas
i think you misunderstand my suggestion — given that the status of ‘woman’ is elective on the basis of personal declaration, wouldn’t men choose the ‘formal’ status of woman, but stop there? they’d receive the benefit, still otherwise in all ways be men
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @PaulSkallas
it seems like you actually have a bigger problem than you think then
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @pinkypillzmain @PaulSkallas
your policy suggestion is at least adjudicatable
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Straight maternity leave? Sure it's nice but this proposal goes further and changes the nature of work in modern society
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulSkallas
i think the funnier sort of line of thought for me is not just that it would be very difficult to actually administer, especially by creating a systematic incentive status-switch incentive with no costs, but that it would probably produce the opposite of its intended effect
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
much like sexual liberalism did not, in fact, lead to an increasing equality of sexuality vis-a-vis the number of people enjoying a sexual life
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.