One expert responds to the study.https://twitter.com/stgoldst/status/1223337410743820288?s=19 …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I’ll happily stake my PhD studying coronaviruses on this not being any kind of engineered virus.
-
We just published a debunking of this from a bioinformatics expert:https://theprepared.com/blog/no-the-2019-ncov-genome-doesnt-actually-seem-engineered-from-hiv/ …
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Annand is a certified clown though.
-
That has been peer reviewed.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why on earth would they presume HIV? The longest sequence "identity" is 6 (SIX) residues long! That's preposterous.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Why is this unfortunate? The research is being retweeted by some reputable and respectable scientists as well.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Seriously Occam’s razor says coronavirus is just that strain of SARS they found in bats living in caves near wuhan like 3 years ago now. Anybody thinking China is out to kill people with an engineered virus don’t understand china’s goals as a nation lol.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
needs corroboration for sure. but the evidence and conclusions seems pretty damning.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
A lot of effort to go to.
@WHO needs to stay on top of such papers and quosh any that are not peer reviewed (before the tabloids get hold)Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.