@SelfishWizard Probably means human consciousness here. So, even the panpsychist must explain how human consc. has emerged. And that's a big problem for panpsychism (the combination problem).
-
-
-
Unless it doesn't need to combine to emerge. Stay tuned!

- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
but it just obviously couldn't have, right? Right? That's what this "argument" boils down to.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Consciousness doesn’t exist in me on the sofa after a large meal. Perhaps the Big Bang was full up!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@SelfishWizard can't use current theories of Big Bang to assert that there was no consciousness before. You use gravity to assert galaxies formed but why is gravity more fundamental a property than consciousness? The apple falling on my head is only as real as my experience of itHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
1) there is no evidence (in bang evidence) of anything beyond what physics already knows 2) if you can't tell me even one property, one dispositional power, of it you are positing an empty explanation for a later appearing phenomenon
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.