One thing you didn't mention is type alias impl traits, which would allow us to name futures again. This is at least preventing us from using async/await syntax in a bunch of places in Quinn.
-
-
-
This would also allow me to drop a few allocations from tonics server handling due to the use of tower. :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Async no_std?
-
This would hugely benefit from the removal of thread-local storage from the libstd implementation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Error handling is where it's at.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Regardless of what folks decide, please try to write guides and not just sparse api docs. It's a shame how many great tools go unused because no one knows they exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice! Since you say you "probably missed some", another runtime for embedded: https://www.drone-os.com/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coroutines
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are your thoughts on [a]sync-agnostic functions a la Zig? Are they technically possible at all in Rust? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20719621 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
async in traits?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.