What you describe sounds a lot like a pseudo-mind-map. Also I wonder if the pro/con distinction is inherent in the design process or might create needless antagonism we could avoid with a different setup?
New #rustlang blog post: describing a recent experiment on how to better summarize conversations (and hopefully change the dynamics in the process) http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2019/04/22/aic-collaborative-summary-documents/ …
-
-
-
I have some more ideas on this, but they are not really tweet-compatible. Will write up a blog post soon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am concerned that the promise of "never" breaking the language (and libstd) helps make these discussions contentious, because people are worried we'd be stuck with whatever decisions we make forever
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can I jump in and point you at several types of software that may facilitate this: https://www.mind-mapping.org/index.php?title=Argunet … https://www.mind-mapping.org/index.php?title=Cohere … https://www.mind-mapping.org/index.php?title=Debategraph … https://www.mind-mapping.org/index.php?title=Rationale … https://www.mind-mapping.org/index.php?title=Southbeach_Modeller …
-
These are all tools for visualizing and communicating arguments and counter-arguments.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And, it's super cool that you and the Rust world are working so hard on this!
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.