@nikomatsakis "LALRPOP doesn't have any built-in features for giving precedence to operators, mostly because I consider those to be creepy" … So, "creepy" was not a word I was expecting in this context. Where'd that come from? As in scope creep, or just… creepy?
-
Thanks for clarifying! I'm not generally a fan of having ten levels of obscurely-named precedence-driven rules, but yeah, the tricks to introduce precedence parsing into grammar-driven parsers aren't unproblematic either
I wanted to introduce some form of syntactic sugar that would expand to the multiple precedence levels in a controlled way, but I haven't really had any time to do LALRPOP hacking -- or even maintenance! -- in a long time. :(
-
-
I figured as much. It's a cool project so far, but yeah, the amount of stuff one person can do has a limit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.