Will read and revert.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Stopping naked virus particles isn’t the goal. Stopping the aerosol and larger respiratory droplets that carry the virus particles, which are MUCH larger, is.


-
Also melt-blown masks don't work like tiny sieves, ...also sarscov2 is 300x the diameter of oxygen, it's not 'basically the size of a molecule.' How is this still a conversation?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This tweet reflects a profound ignorance of the science. As well as boundless arrogance and egotism. It is a Dunning-Kruger tweet.
-
Now that's a scientific argument.
The bottom line is lab studies showing droplets are blocked by masks fail to show that public masking has any benefit. Anyone who understands science AND public policy should get this. An policy intervention that only works in the lab -> - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Eegit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More I read such threads less I believe in people
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Diameter Corona Virus: ~100 nm Diameter O2 molecule: ~0.35 nm Do you people even try to understand this shit?
-
That's the very definition of a straw man argument. Not only have I not compared the size of a virus particle with an Oxygen molecule, I have not even mentioned oxygen. Biological molecules come in a range of sizes, and viruses fall within that range.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.