maybe you could do some journalism and find out why they have never published on this, and why so dif from all other studies
-
-
-
No one is allowed to question trans ideology. That alone should scare you into taking a closer look.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
what was your motivation for attack? Are you oblivious to the real hurt you are dealing out to families with trans kids?
-
Are suggesting people don't protect children because it would hurt your feelings? Seriously?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this is what I think of your programmehttps://growinguptransgender.wordpress.com/2017/01/13/bbc-sponsor-vicious-attack-on-transgender-children/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is what data at GIDS shows. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-015-2413-x …pic.twitter.com/kIIEC89FxG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I follow science from peer reviewed papers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
clueless? I have a PhD in biochemistry? You?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do a critical analysis of the pr papers I read and a lot are BS. I suggest you read http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674063518 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well that applies to the studies you linked, but whatever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.