thanks to some people in the question section who rightly expressed this was disturbing. as one person wrote, "it seems like a significant shift from desiring to not omit history to asking them to justify slavery from perspectives of the oppressors and the oppressed"
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
for reasons beyond me, classicists STILL fail to realize how inappropriate the question is ("was [X genocide] justified"). the presenter stressed that ancient slavery was not racebased; however the logic of modern slavery makes the q "was ancient slavery justified" possible
Näytä tämä ketju -
as
@dugankp pointed out in a panel yesterday, “racism exists & is in play regardless of intention." I don't want this particular presentation to take away from others in the panel, but it was sad to see her get defensive after people expressed how hurtful this framing wasNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
How horrid!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Absolutely horrifying, wtf
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
yeah this was shocking. I thought maybe I was misunderstanding, so was relieved (I mean, kind of?) to see people in the chat echoing my thoughts. totally not okay.
-
I should clarify: shocking, but not surprising.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
what the actual fuck?? I hope some of the reactions to it managed to get through to her
-
unfortunately no, she made a lot of excuses, stressed her good intentions, and weaponized an aspect of her identity (class background) as an excuse. as someone who is also from a working class family, I found it especially objectionable
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
