There are laws against it in Europe I believe.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He’s a nut case anyway. I’d be concerned if YouTube was removing legitimate news from their site. I don’t blame them for removing some wacko harassing mass shooting victims.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Is he in prison? Was his website removed from the internet? He’s still free to be a nut case all he wants, he’s just not being allowed to utilize a private company to monetize his madness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So all private companies should be forced to serve everyone no matter what? It’s okay for the baker to deny service to a gay couple, but not okay for YouTube to refuse service to Alex Jones?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @gleekagleeka @studentlogan and
They didn’t remove Alex Jones’ channel for political beliefs. It was for harassing mass shooting survivors. If they were going after one specific political party more people would have had their channel removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
He called out specific people by name and called them crisis actors. YouTube doesn’t equal the government. They don’t have to serve anyone they don’t want to. Same goes for Twitter. Idk what else to tell you, freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.