The reaction to some of these WikiLeaks exchanges w/reporters reveals a pretty profound disconnect about what journalism is and entails.
-
-
But a weird idea has taken hold that these interactions--calling people, checking facts, seeing if there is more info you need--is corrupt.
-
Our business is, as
@attackerman points out, pretty opaque. So maybe more transparency about the process would be helpful. -
Not sure exactly what this kind of transparency would look like. Lots of good journalism is aided by confidentiality (and some crap, too.)
-
There are all kinds of conventions that it turns out most people don't understand--datelines, for example, according to audience research.
-
So I'm not sure what the answer is. But if you have a question about how I wrote a story I wrote, let me know. I will answer if I can.
-
Kind of like how folks find it offensive that reporters track down family members/witnesses thru Twitter after a tragedy.
-
Definitely one of the hardest things I've done in my career.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
but the media influences the people. Look at Fox how they painted us Muslims over the last 15+ years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Muslims make up 2/10 doctors. We contribute to the economy through Halal shops. We give charity for the poor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we are only seen as bad people or terrorist. They never that includes other media outlets too report on all the good we do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet, you are not releasing your private email communications for transparency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.