Here the editor of the @ahr_editor of the premier historical journal weighs in responding to what he calls a hostile and belated reaction by @seanwilentz and a few others as well as the orchestrated campaign by @WSWSMedia.https://academic.oup.com/ahr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ahr/rhaa041/5714757 …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Here is
@jmadelman, an historian of early AMerican with an expertise in colonial newspapers who dismantled Wilentz’s assertions that there’s no evidence in newspapers that Southern colonists worried about the Somerset decision.https://earlyamericanists.comPrikaži ovu nit -
Here is historian David Waldstreicher’s brilliant analysis of how the effort to discredit the
#1619Project is really part of a larger feud amongst historians about how we should view our founding and the essential character of our country. http://bostonreview.net/race-politics/david-waldstreicher-hidden-stakes-1619-controversy …pic.twitter.com/fOOkKesBSi
Prikaži ovu nit -
And of course,
@NicholasGuyatt@marthasjones_@GilmoreGlenda@TheTattooedProf@CharlesPostel and many other historians have been having school on here about these issues for weeks.Prikaži ovu nit -
As I have said many, many times, we consulted historians for the
#1619Project, historians wrote for the project and historians fact checked this project. Just not the ones criticizing the project.Prikaži ovu nit -
I am grateful to all the historians who have engaged, offered advice and critique and support. I find the debate fascinating and illuminating and a public good. It’s an amazing thing to see so many people engaged with this history and history in general.
Prikaži ovu nit -
And I am sure publications such as
@TheAtlantic@WSJ@NRO@spectator@WSWSMedia that published pieces saying that the project had been trashed, discredited, panned by historians will devote as much print to these refutations as they did to those arguing we got our facts wrong.Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@jessesingal@CathyYoung63@coldxman@CHSommers I'm sure you guys will feature these historians as promptly as you've featured others. Right? - Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
For non-academics wondering if this delayed response is suspicious—if this means we academics don’t really stand behind the 1619 Project when we say we do—please understand that this is a LIGHTNING-QUICK response for us.
-
We’re neither lazy nor slow in our work, but the work itself is painstaking and effortful. No doubt 3+ years from now, some responses to Wilentz will finally see light of day.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
