Gradient descent is hugely controversial in neuroscience. See the ultimate megathread: https://treeverse.app/view/1hX6Xm0w
Prikaži ovu nit
Where would you say the controversy comes from? More or less controversial then other purely theoretical neuroscience that don't (afaik) have supporting empirical evidence?
-
-
Thing is that the people arguing pro GD (e.g. me) are far more convinced about it than those of other theories. The correlation argument I am making requires just local linearity and under that assumption becomes provable. Hence, to us, it is not really a theory.
-
"provable under assumption" without empirical evidence sure sounds like a theory to me but ymmv
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
IMO, the controversy is driven by the sense that this is computer scientists swooping in and pretending that they can solve the brain. That's not what it is, I think, but there's a sense that it is. Kinda like this comic:https://xkcd.com/793/
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
More controversial than MANIFOLDS???
-
But but but mah Ising models!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.