It depends on the network, @deworrall92 and others have done nice stuff on rotation equivariance e.g. https://deworrall92.github.io/2017/06/01/harmonic_networks.html … :)
-
-
-
still, it looks like its inference roughly corresponds with mine (except when the 'duck' is upside down - need to do a better job with those priors). We certainly aren't rotationally equivariant!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
It’s been such an intense kind of sociology week
@LivUniSoc that here’s Wittgenstein turning up in my Twitter feed first thing on a Saturday morning? Think I’m still dreaming. -
The only two words I remember from those who did sociology at
@GoldsmithsUoL were phenomenology and ethnomethodology. - Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The answer is simple: Yes!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
But what about when the duckrabbits are going at it like bunnies?pic.twitter.com/nAS3243CFw
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Dammit, so which one is it? :)
-
We can't easily say it's both because they're incompatible with each other. But to then say that it is neither a duck nor a rabbit misses something, as either interpretation of the black &white dots is an adequate interpretation. Aristotle's logic replaced by a logic of ambiguity
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.