What I like about this & the Whishaw chapter that’s been rediscovered is that it shows there are the rich sensory signals running through subcortical areas are clearly sufficient for many complex, proactive actions.
-
-
-
yeah I do think a lot more behavior is subcortical than grad students is canonically taught cortex = refinement/subtle variations, complex pattern recognition that have little effect in macro sense but big effect in fitness sense?
-
I want to see these behavior classification algorithms run on decorticated animals
-
How hard would it be to rig up reversible opto-decortication do you think?
-
Pretty easy. We have 3 rigs in our lab. Polished dental acrylic gives long-term optical access to most of cortex in VGAT-ChR2 mice. Optical control hardware <$2k for whole cortex, <$10k for targeted random access. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24361077 pic.twitter.com/yK0vBFmbMV
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Great! Now folks can start working on the behaviors that are cortically dependent
-
is there a review/list somewhere of behaviors that are expected/known to be cortically-dependent?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
An
#evergreen question in my#affectiveneuroscience course: What can rats do without a cortex? (tl;dr: quite a bit)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ah the good old days "...these kittens did not survive the period just after the operation although various types of anaesthesia and postoperative treatment were tried."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
interesting that it lost its cute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Less refinement of behavior due to reduced self-feedback?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.