"We cannot forget that even when this state was at its highest levels of incarceration, tragedies still occurred. We cannot revert to thinking that the solution to any problem is more incarceration . . . when those policies do not make us safer."https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Don-t-use-S-F-tragedy-to-justify-return-to-15869071.php …
-
-
Of greater risk, and to whom, Paul? And of what kind of risks? Are we going to have epidemiologists run our justice system without regard to the actual presence of crime?
-
Danger is to the public at large, In pandemics yes we should listen to the guidance of our epidemiologists to make our society safer, but also our politicians who wrote the laws like our
@HouseJudiciary .https://judiciary.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2893 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No question. By releasing criminals from prison, we are reducing the risks of covid. But, in exchange, we are increasing the risks of being robbed, assaulted, and murdered. So, I’m not so sure epidemiological risk should be the primary measure here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.