In Florida, they gave zero citations for not having snow chains on your tires, why? Because Snow is not a problem. Do these areas with low incarceration have high crime rates? if they did have higher crime rates would they have higher incarceration? It's people not policy.
-
-
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @sutros_revenge and
5% of our city is black but 50+% of our prisoners are. Your supposition is not that the cops are racist, but there is something inherently more criminal about this community and Americans as a whole?https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/implicit-bias-trainer-finds-extreme-degree-of-anti-black-sentiment-within-sfpd/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @MikeWaxonWaxoff and
what does any of this have to do with keeping repeat offenders in jail? It's a dereliction of duty to citizens who are living in fear.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdityaBhavnani @MikeWaxonWaxoff and
Paul Retweeted SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY
The reason why we are not incarcerating in quite as historic of a level is because doing so in this moment poses existential epidemiological threats to society at large.
@chesaboudin is thankfully decarceration on guidance from our medical professionals.https://twitter.com/SFDAOffice/status/1333825561144147970?s=20 …Paul added,
SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY @SFDAOfficeCheck out this new report from@SFDAOffice on our use of data to drive decision making around rapid decarceration. With COVID cases spiking, this is a critical resource to help other jurisdictions save lives inside jails and in the broader community. https://sfdistrictattorney.org/policy/justice-driven-data/an-epidemic-inside-a-pandemic/ … pic.twitter.com/v7yed0fn071 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @AdityaBhavnani and
We went over this, in San Francisco decarceration statistically may save three inmates from dying of COVID in jail. Decarceration is killing way more than three, so if it's about lives, then use that as the metric. And don't subjectively pick and choose, make sense?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @AdityaBhavnani and
No because it's not about the lives on the inside but about the epidemiological risk to everyone by keeping people in overcrowded congregate settings. Doing so makes us all sick!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @netfire4 @AdityaBhavnani and
So you're actually implying that the public is "safer" if contained law breakers are released because law breakers will follow Covid safety protocols?pic.twitter.com/Iv6RLTMbG9
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @AdityaBhavnani and
Paul Retweeted David Menschel
Yep because our prisons and jails are the recognized epicenter of this epidemiological crisis. Almost any other circumstance is safer than jailing people in this moment of pandemic.https://twitter.com/davidminpdx/status/1272362171796647936?s=20 …
Paul added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @MikeWaxonWaxoff and
Sounds like one wants to avoid being sentenced to jail What about those that are already there?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SaviRoman @MikeWaxonWaxoff and
Our
@SF_DPH and our@HouseJudiciary to release prisoners from our overcrowded mass incarceration system in response to the pandemics existential risks to our society. In our city from ~1300 to 600 prisoners held so far this year.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Paul Retweeted SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Here is @chesaboudin 's discussing using the data to drive how many prisoners is safe for our society to hold.https://twitter.com/SFDAOffice/status/1333825561144147970?s=20 …
Paul added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.