As the most popular currently serving da on social media in the nation, @chesaboudin has substantially improved his brand awareness since his election.
I know I would be even more motivated to campaign for him next time than I was last time.https://twitter.com/netfire4/status/1191449357377097729?s=20 …
-
-
National Social media is the bar, not results. What is the measure of success? Is it perceived "fairness" over all else? How much time, money, increased criminal activity, etc... should we allow for experiments? When do we admit "the cure is worse than the disease"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Paul Retweeted SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Hear
@chesaboudin , and our@SFDAOffice , this isn't an experiment, nor is it how imagine running his office. Da's job is protect the lives of public, in this moment of pandemic that means reducing incarceration, Chesas been told, by at least another 27%.https://twitter.com/SFDAOffice/status/1333825561144147970?s=20 …Paul added,
SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY @SFDAOfficeCheck out this new report from@SFDAOffice on our use of data to drive decision making around rapid decarceration. With COVID cases spiking, this is a critical resource to help other jurisdictions save lives inside jails and in the broader community. https://sfdistrictattorney.org/policy/justice-driven-data/an-epidemic-inside-a-pandemic/ … pic.twitter.com/v7yed0fn071 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @TheMarinaTimes and
And would a metric for protecting lives be lives protected? And lives is a bit loose, unless you include quality of life.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @TheMarinaTimes and
When loss of long term life is a likely hood and central to the evaluation of reducing incarceration, short term quality of life should be sacrificed to increase the number of quality lives that may be lived after the epidemiological crisis. Hard to have a quality life when dead.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @netfire4 @TheMarinaTimes and
"when dead"...Says the 700+ ODs & murdered who were victims of released drug dealers, and other recidivist felons. But hey, at least the felons were able to spend time with their families and give their kids someone else's bike for Christmas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @TheMarinaTimes and
Also it's obviously not about the lives of the felons, but the cost of the response, how ineffective it is, and the danger posed by congregate settings in this moment of existential threat of pandemic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @TheMarinaTimes and
Moving goal posts. Seems it's more whatever can be spun to support "the belief" at the time. Like politicians, every failure is the result of the previous administration or some external factor, every success is the direct result of theirs. Like Shaggy's, "It wasn't me"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @TheMarinaTimes and
It's really not moving goal posts, our health department says the maximum our mass incarceration system can hold without causing a local covid outbreak is now 600 people, 700 less than usual. The da must in his view take the safest choice data driven decarceration bc of pandemic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @TheMarinaTimes and
Cost benefit. According to prison stats, chance of death from covid-19 has been less than %1 right? So if just a few people are killed by the negative externalities of decarceration, it wouldn't defend the position. Have more than a few died?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Our actions today, are to prevent the worst from occuring, as it is doing elsewhere in the country, where prisons and jails have acted as local epicenters, contaminating their local communities, overwhelming icus, and leading to much much higher rates of death.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.