In this land the vast majority of us are able to live our lives without inhibiting happiness and success of our community. Happy to go lower than 600 if so many inmates are able to meet the aforementioned bar of confidence for parole and will be sent back to prison if they don't.
-
-
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
That wasn't the question, how might you prioritize releasing the remaining 28% of 835? Given that we may following medical guidance hold only 600, & there are many more that you regularly complain need incarcerated failing your standard of complying w incoherent excessive law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
I answered the question - 600 is a guideline estimate. We get as close as we can while remaining confident that those paroled won't negatively impact the [already struggling] community I also don't advocate for incarceration - status quo is unacceptable but I'm open to solutions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
Paul Retweeted Paul
So I was asking, how would you prioritize the release of the additional 235, and you answered more people should be incarcerated than we have currently, how is that answering the question?https://twitter.com/netfire4/status/1341089659120545792 …
Paul added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @commieboudin @netfire4 and
If you're arrested 15 times for stealing vehicles in 18 months then I have no empathy for you. You can go to jail and if you get COVID then you have no one to blame but yourself - it's your fault that you're in that cell.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
But in doing so, its society gettingg covid not the prisoner that is at risk when we incarcerate people in mass. As is discussed in this letter from our
@HouseJudiciary ,@RepKarenBass@RepJerryNadlerhttps://judiciary.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2893 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
I have yet to hear how you would deal with a man who has been caught 15 times stealing vehicles in 18 months. This man has time and again proven he has no desire to behave in a way that is acceptable for our society. Would you continue to do nothing? Do we hire a babysitter?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_Shoobie @michelletandler and
We've hired and are paying babysitters they are called probation officers. I don't like them I don't think they are effective, but they as a solution are much cheaper than mass incarceration. I would not ever condone the usage of incarceration short of violent crime.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @netfire4 @michelletandler and
We both agree - They're not effective and therefore not worth spending money on. They're not a solution. My solution is jail, what would you do with someone who repeatedly robbed their neighbors demonstrating that they are unfit to live in our community?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Incarceration is a solution unfit for society. In this moment of pandemic there is no theft that would mean to me that the risks of incarceration to society exceed the risks of a free thief. A better system should be created but for now if I was god they go free.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.