Kamala Harris ran to the right of Hallinan, and Gavin Newsom ran to the right of Matt Gonzalez and appointed Gascon to replace Harris. None of this really matters because it is you all who are way out of step with SF juries.
I fail to see this, as breed was reelected relatively recently. Incumbents usually receive an advantage, and the mayor was on this ballot as well. If there were such significant challenges to the mayors authority, wouldn't they have competitively also run?
-
-
The "Progressives" are the inauthentic opposition and declined to run a candidate against Breed. They probably felt that incumbents have the advantage and that if they swiped at the queen and failed to topple her, that she'd take revenge against "their" nonprofits.
-
When such obvious abuses of power exist, such as Nuru, and the mayoral directions of chief Scott, they were obviously right to think the process far from impartial.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.