You suggesting raccoon bipedalism is unrealistic?pic.twitter.com/w8Wj8PdZ4J
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You suggesting raccoon bipedalism is unrealistic?pic.twitter.com/w8Wj8PdZ4J
because bipedal was the main focus of the comment. Wtfiwwy?
Twas a joke ma'am
Jokes are funny. That wasn't. That was just kinda dumb.
Unsure why Dr. Tyson retweeted it then
Because cute animal pics make people happy. No matter the content. Or perhaps he liked it. Don't know the man, couldn't say.
I think you're taking Racoon Twitter far too seriously ma'am. Though that's just my opinion. And opinions as with jokes are subjective
JOKES ARE SUBJECTIVE. YES. FINALLY.
DON'T CALL HIM A RACCOON!
Trash Panda. :)
Is that better?
Must also accept a talking tree.
I am Groot? I am Groot.
Neil deGroot Tyson.
If a Raccoon was to evolve into a talking bipedal artillery-wielding creature, it'd have no effect on explosions being audible in space tho
It's about the suspension of disbelief. If you apply rigorous scrutiny of one you must for the other.
Suspension of disbelief's all good, I have no issue with explosions being audible in the movie. But his logic/reasoning is flawed regardless
it's the If>Then that fails -unless- you were to take a stance opposing fe evolution, from that persp. you could argue the tweet is fine
Did you actually imply that the reasoning/logic of one of the most brilliant minds on Earth is flawed?? Lol
In this instance, if we are to make anything of his tweet, absolutely! No one owns good reasoning and everyone has access to it.
assessing feasibility in fiction ought to be based I'd think on what's possible at some other world. So brilliant David Lewis argued anyway.
No doubt, I'd never argue otherwise
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.