@neiltyson In theory, but look no further than the $200,000 raised on their behalf to see how rewarding bigotry can be.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@neiltyson Seriously tho, will you build a planetarium in my backyard? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@neiltyson I still struggle with the fact they already had religious freedom. So what exactly are they legislating ? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@neiltyson I have always wondered why you would want to limit who buys your product. Isn't the goal of business to get everyone to buy it? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@neiltyson All while being an asshole! -
@philtheswo@neiltyson But undermining religious diversity & tolerance for ideology is not an asshole move? -
@Stultis_TheFool@neiltyson Tolerance for ideology, yes. Tolerance for using that ideology to discriminate? No. -
@philtheswo@neiltyson No,#BoycottIndiana advos are undermining diversity & tolerance by gratuitously attacking#RFRA's... -
@Stultis_TheFool@neiltyson Um, what? And yeah, I'm totally OK with undermining ignorant bigots. -
@philtheswo@neiltyson You support bigotry to fight bigots. You undermine diversity to advance it. It's insane, sad and ugly. -
@Stultis_TheFool@neiltyson You really don't understand life, do you? Using religion to defend ANY action is pretty dumb.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...is that sometimes, planetarium curators say very silly things. MT
@neiltyson Another way to look at “Religious Freedom” lawsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@neiltyson@IanMolony (1) YESS!!!! That is why, for superfluous and personalized products and services (wedding cake, photography, etc.), -
@neiltyson@IanMolony (2) I don't see what the problem is; nobody is being harmed (except for the provider.) -
No one shall be burdened in body or goods by the religious beliefs of another TJ Basis for 1st Amend
#EndOfStory@JimbauxsJournal@neiltyson -
@IanMolony@neiltyson (1) And, in the case of refusing do to superfluous personalized things (like wedding cake, photography, architecture, -
@IanMolony@neiltyson (2) etc.), nobody would be burdened! That is a distinction that is not nearly often enough made. -
I saw it the first time
@JimbauxsJournal XD@neiltyson -
@IanMolony@neiltyson Well, I'm glad that YOU (seem to) get that important distinction, but it seems to me that most people do not get it. -
It's a conceptual experiment & we are all lab rats. Oh...those Founders! LOL! Infinite variables--->humans XD
@JimbauxsJournal@neiltyson - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.