RT @neiltyson: If you are pro-solar power, try not to hold up signs that say "No Nukes" because that's exactly how the Sun makes its energy.
-
-
-
@zeusisdead@neiltyson sun energy is nuclear fusion . . nuclear plants is fission . . both are vastly different . . please read school books -
@spinesurgeon hahaha. Good one. and this guy is Astrophysicist !!@zeusisdead@neiltyson -
@amishra77 thanks sir :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you are pro-solar power, try not to hold up signs that say "No Nukes" because that's exactly how the Sun makes its energy. RT
@neiltyson -
@Lars9596@neiltyson Just that the sun does so at a rather safe distance ...and probably burns its own waste... -
@temporaryhermit@neiltyson And it may have been around before the first "No Nukes" signs appeared. ; ) -
@Lars9596@neiltyson Also, it probably can't read. ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Coal is renewable Energy too... every 300million years give or take a Tuesday.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@neiltyson Would 'no fission' signs be acceptable? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@neiltyson The sun runs on fusion, not on fission, the process used in nuclear power plants. You should know better.@jasonbaldridge -
@SethGrimes@neiltyson@jasonbaldridge My cation about "Nukes" is mostly to do with the ones on the tips of missiles; I am pro solar power! -
@sgt101 Right. The dishonesty in@neiltyson's tweet was pretending that "nukes" means other than weapons & fission plants.@jasonbaldridge -
@SethGrimes@sgt101@neiltyson I took it as a cheeky joke, not a serious comment on nuclear power or weapons... -
@jasonbaldridge Certainly the guy knows the difference, so I'd call it a cheap shot rather than a joke, irresponsible of a scientist. -
@SethGrimes Perhaps. I guess my prior for tweets being irreverent but good natured jokes has been influenced by tweets from@jamesiry. -
@sethgrimes besides which you're wrong. Hydrogen fission bombs are also called "nukes."@jasonbaldridge -
@jamesiry No. I carefully wrote that "nukes" means "weapons & fission plants." I didn't write "fission weapons & plants."@jasonbaldridge - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm ok with a fusion nuclear reactor that's 93 million miles away. But not on Earth thank you
-
What if I told you we need nuclear energy to help defeat climate change, would you accept nuclear as part of the solution?
-
My understanding is there's a healthy debate about this. I'm not convinced that nuclear is a must. Conservation, new sources, etc enough
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.