Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English UK
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log In
    Have an account?
    · Forgotten your password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
neiltyson's profile
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Verified account
@neiltyson

Tweets

Neil deGrasse TysonVerified account

@neiltyson

Astrophysicist

New York City
haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/
Joined January 2009

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Centre
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgotten your password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log In »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not doing it for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account you're not interested in anymore.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart – it lets the person who wrote it know that you appreciate them.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about right now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find out what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Neil deGrasse Tyson‏Verified account @neiltyson 28 Nov 2018

    Scientists & engineers launched “InSight” from Earth (a moving platform) across 300million miles to arrive where Mars (a moving target) will be seven months later, landing safely to do geophysics at the Martian equator. And you have a problem listening to us about climate change?pic.twitter.com/a6gx3jmM2z

    7:40 pm - 28 Nov 2018
    • 36,562 Retweets
    • 111,158 Likes
    • Hampus Avekvist Eugenio William Jelsma Homsy Jewelers Wanda Di Lallo Serdar KAYA Cassio Fonseca K chief man
    3,485 replies . 36,562 retweets 111,158 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Mark Davis‏ @MarkDavis 29 Nov 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        Yes! Because for some reason, on climate, scientists abandon the devotion to data that gets us to #Mars, and engage in flights of political fantasy. Cut it out.

        14 replies . 12 retweets 179 likes
      3. David Schaab‏ @schaabdl 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        A trip to Mars is calculated and repeatable - climate change is neither. Climate change is measurable but its cause has been diverse and its blame on human activities today doesn't explain yesterday. The data doesn't lie but users of the data have a far different motive.

        3 replies . 4 retweets 53 likes
      4. DougZ‏ @Doug_Zbi 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @schaabdl @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        What do you mean “not repeatable?” We’ve seen a trend since the industrial revolution started, and it’s been a reliable predictior for the future. I will be you $10 that next year Earth will experience the hottest avg temperature on record...as it has for the last sev. decades.

        4 replies . 0 retweets 5 likes
      5. David Schaab‏ @schaabdl 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @Doug_Zbi @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        Conduct the experiments in a lab and say they are repeatable. We aren't seeing a trend, we are seeing the acyclic climate changes that have occurred long before the industrial revolution. It is all speculative and cherry-picked data.

        1 reply . 0 retweets 4 likes
      6. DougZ‏ @Doug_Zbi 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @schaabdl @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        We can. In a glass tank create a barrier near the top with CO2 & other naturally occurring greenhouse gases in concentrations from 200 yrs ago. Expose the tank to sunlight. It will rise to a certain temperature. Increase gasses to current levels. The temp. will rise about 2F.

        1 reply . 0 retweets 6 likes
      7. David Schaab‏ @schaabdl 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @Doug_Zbi @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        Ah, so it is natural - expose to sunlight. Something the so-called climate scientist completely ignore so they can blame man and get money. Sorry, these people are playing with the data and have manipulated their findings far too often to be trusted.

        1 reply . 0 retweets 5 likes
      8. DougZ‏ @Doug_Zbi 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @schaabdl @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        🤨 The only source of extra CO2 in the air is from the burning of fossil fuels. Deforestation is removing the mechanism to remove that CO2, hence the increase. It's not natural- the kind of increase we've see in the last 100 years would have taken 200,000 years naturally.

        5 replies . 0 retweets 10 likes
      9. David Schaab‏ @schaabdl 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @Doug_Zbi @MarkDavis @neiltyson

        And that source is so minuscule that there is absolutely no evidence that it has caused a significant increase. And it doesn't explain away periods when we were warmer and colder. Sorry, your evidence just doesn't exist to explain the cycles that have existed. Not causal.

        3 replies . 0 retweets 4 likes
      10. 4 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. jack‏ @Jackodum74 29 Nov 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        Neil, youre a baller, but yall boys cant even predict a 7 day forcast so i mean what have you done for me lately

        3 replies . 1 retweet 19 likes
      3. radicle‏ @real__radicle 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @Jackodum74 @neiltyson

        you can't predict the result of one coin toss but you can easily predict the result of 100 coin tosses

        3 replies . 3 retweets 36 likes
      4. FlintFire‏ @treidius 1 Dec 2018
        Replying to @real__radicle @Jackodum74 @neiltyson

        Underrated tweet.

        0 replies . 0 retweets 5 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Nathan Martin‏ @Nathanflies 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        You sir have truly won the internet, take the week off!! 🤣

        2 replies . 9 retweets 30 likes
      3. Electronic- ssa.‏ @Procrastinasaur 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @Nathanflies @neiltyson

        Yeesh dude. Read the room.

        1 reply . 0 retweets 4 likes
      4. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. Raider Dave of the Space Force‏ @Raider_Dave13 29 Nov 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        Yes. Because expertise in one area does not confer expertise in all areas. Also, you have already attempted to mislead us more than once on the subject.

        4 replies . 2 retweets 57 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. Physics & Astronomy Zone‏ @ZonePhysics 8 Dec 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        https://www.physics-astronomy.org/2018/12/nasa-releases-first-sounds-ever.html …😳😳😳😳

        0 replies . 4 retweets 16 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. jgderuvo‏ @jgderuvo 29 Nov 2018
        Replying to @neiltyson

        Are you having a problem listening to the scientists who disagree ? Are you having trouble with forged data? Seriously Neil.

        1 reply . 0 retweets 7 likes
      3. richard prusik‏ @RPrusik 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @jgderuvo @neiltyson

        True 3% of scientists disagree and say it’s not real. All funded by fossil fuel or other industries that have an interest in denying it.

        1 reply . 1 retweet 3 likes
      4. Nymx‏ @Nymx4 30 Nov 2018
        Replying to @RPrusik @jgderuvo @neiltyson

        It's a lot more than 3% and the ones that do agree are paid by the gov so what's the difference?

        0 replies . 0 retweets 2 likes
      5. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Centre
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info