- was it not enough for you that Rep Gabbard disagreed w/ you about who should be the Dem nominee? This moved you to be so divisive?
-
-
-
Friend, check her record. And there are plenty of Sanders' surrogates & even campaign staff I'm fans of. Feel free to check the timeline.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What type of monster would meet with a murderous dictator?pic.twitter.com/sIDlxFVJg6
-
the SOS.
-
as SoS she should've known better than to lend legitimacy to the Saudi regime by meeting with them publicly
-
Yeah secretary of states never meet with problematic governments cause diplomacy is only for friendly democracies.
-
Oh, like she was meeting with them to chide them? Listen to yourself.
-
Diplomacy is "chiding" apparently. You're right, if she wasn't "chiding" she wasn't doing diplomacy.
-
You are dodging the point that the Saudis are staunch US allies. HRC's engagement with them was not to criticize their human rights abuses.
-
You're also dodging the point that Gabbard is on the House For Rel & Armed Services committees, so had diplomatic reasons to meet w/ Assad.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
2/2 and given that u r always on the "sexist wagon" I'd like to see you take on a male war vet with her opinions in this way - there r many
-
She's taking on a sitting congresswoman, not a random vet. And not for being anti-war but for being pro-Assad.
-
Asking for evidence is not pro-Assad.It's a logical question given that the government once lied to go to war.
-
PSA: You can be anti-war w/out shilling for Assad. Other Dems do it. Oh, and Tulsi's not anti-warhttps://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/649458891168714752 …
-
Still, doesn't invalidate her question about asking for proof.Are you against asking for evidence?
-
You don't even have to go back that far for precedent. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/05/un-sources-say-rebel-forces-not-assad-used-sarin-gas/315588/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are you kidding? Tulsi is one of the few in DC with a conscience and integrity to tell the truth.Murderous dictator? Who? Obama?
-
Assad and his regime have killed 500,000 Syrians. Why do you ignore that?
-
How many have we killed in Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan, Libya and Syria?
-
False equivalence. The US doesn't intervene with intention to kill people there. Geopolitical reasons, yes, but INTENT is crucial here.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Collateral Damage is an Orwellian Term if there ever was one.
-
Inaction in Syria has greater consequences. 'Anti-war brigade' needs to give constructive arguments against humanitarian interventions.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.