U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
What Bruenig is saying is that she can’t imagine anyone earnestly caring about those things because she is an anti-choice, class-focused lefty who believes in trickle down equality.
It seems odd for the left to hate liberals more than conservatives while Trump is president, but there you have it.
And, I mean, my main objections are ethical here, but, also, who in the political world is using "deference" to POC or LGBTQ people to advance conservative causes? This is just empirically false.
The Bruenigs of the world are always talking about money. Once you realize that, no matter the alleged topic, it’s always about wealth distribution, it’s easier to parse the nonsense.
Raise your hand if you’ve gotten a leftist fired for being mean to you online when that person’s wife was about to give birth.
That didn’t happen.
It’s because a successful liberal is more dangerous to the extremists on either side than is their opposite number. The extremist claims that only their agenda can work. If the liberal pragmatic approach works, then the extremist loses their reason for existing.
Like selling out organized labor for venture capital money?
These are indeed strange times...
I've stopped thinking in terms of those labels. I now see everyone as either "wants to deny me healthcare and employment" or doesn't. A small, but highly vocal contingent of the left falls in the prior category.
Because for a certain kind of left winger it has never been about policies that help actual people. It has always been about proving one's own purity.
The same could be said for those who are more interested in appearing "woke" than in implementing policies that improve people's lives in tangible ways.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
