@caleb_hattingh @hackuador I've had similar thoughts: BSD, but with a fee if you make a profit (scaled to size of profit).
-
-
Replying to @freakboy3742
@freakboy3742 @caleb_hattingh what is the effect on downstream distribution? Prohibited? Remit to uppermost upstream? No restrictions?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hackuador
@hackuador @caleb_hattingh Underlying motivation: getting large corps making money by using open source to be forced to give back.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @freakboy3742
@freakboy3742 @caleb_hattingh you can charge whatever to whomever, but restrictions on redistribution violate definition of free software.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hackuador
@hackuador @caleb_hattingh I want to find a way to *force* people making money to contribute back, without restricting ability to tinker.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @freakboy3742
@freakboy3742@hackuador @caleb_hattingh Contributing dev time is better than contributing money - company pays the overheads.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ncoghlan_dev
@freakboy3742@hackuador @caleb_hattingh Trick is to make it obvious when marketing are making promises their engineering can't meet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@freakboy3742 @hackuador @caleb_hattingh Linux Foundation, OpenStack Foundation are good at that, other communities not so much.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.