Nate Cardozo
To be clear, if the FBI's legal argument is correct, then a single judge could outlaw strong encryption. Apple must win this fight.
-
@alexsimonelis@matthew_d_green The analogy stands. Their legal argument works against every crypto provider.
Alex Simonelis
.@matthew_d_green If the FBI's argument against Apple succeeds have, nothing prevents them from ordering Moxie to backdoor Signal.
-
-
@ncardozo@matthew_d_green Signal is free software and end-to-end encrypted. You can read the source and compile your own version without BD -
@mikeokner
@matthew_d_green Thank you captain obvious -
@ncardozo@matthew_d_green k so how can the FBI order Moxie to do jack shit? You'd instantly see a million forks. -
@mikeokner
@matthew_d_green Order Moxie to push custom update through the App/Play Store to a specific user. Only tiny change of detection. -
@mikeokner
@matthew_d_green Nothing shows up in the codebase. -
@ncardozo I'm only familiar with iOS, but it wouldn't be possible to push an update to a single user via the App Store. All or none. -
@mikeokner Wrong. With Apple under compulsion as well, Signal could absolutely push an update to one Apple ID.
-
@mikeokner Agreed that rooted/jailbroken phones could detect. But that possibility is remote.
- Show more
-
-
@ncardozo@matthew_d_green#OpenKey http://crp.to/ok Opensource encryption, you own the keys and can validate there is no backdoor -
@ncardozo@astepanovich@matthew_d_green To succeed doesn't Apple have to admit that it wasn't being truthful about their security?
Mike
Tim Steiner
NewYorkLibertarian
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.