1. I think that the ban of Donald Trump on Twitter is an unacceptable act of censorship (THREAD)
Pokaż ten wątek
-
8. Of course, Twitter is a private company, but we have seen many examples in Russian and China of such private companies becoming the state's best friends and the enablers when it comes to censorship.
Pokaż ten wątek
9. If you replace "Trump" with "Navalny" in today's discussion, you will get an 80% accurate Kremlin's answer as to why my name can't be mentioned on Russian TV and I shouldn't be allowed to participate in any elections.
-
-
10. This precedent will be exploited by the enemies of freedom of speech around the world. In Russia as well. Every time when they need to silence someone, they will say: 'this is just common practice, even Trump got blocked on Twitter'.
Pokaż ten wątek - Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
How many of your actions directly caused the death of 5 persons?
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Be thankful Twitter and Google are not Russian companies. The reason we in the US know more about you than any other opposition to Putin is because of these companies. The reason you can post here is because you don’t break Twitter rules. Trump does. That’s why he’s gone.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
This was done with specific threats against specific people in mind. Private businesses have every right to bar terrorists from their platform.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
You’re coming at this from your reality, which is not the U.S. reality. Twitter can ban whomever they want. They don’t have to give reasons. Our tv and radio stations can choose whom they do or do not have as guests. This isn’t infringing on FA rights. They are privately-held.
-
US-problem, yes, but not only. In addition with a fascist ideology, racism as system for maintaining power of the white privilege has sent these proud boys/girls into the arena. Blocking accounts was beside a simple violation of rules a accurate, valuable moral choice.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I feel this analysis Is wrong because he is actively trying to instigate a violent insurrection and his megaphones must be shut down to avoid harm. Also he is the pres and if he wants to be heard he can release a news release or give a speech whenever he wants
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.