On point 1, she is correct that the Secretary for Security has to withdraw the bill under Rule 64 of the LegCo Rules of Procedure. She can't do it outside of LegCo. https://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/procedur/content/partk.htm …
Some facts you have to know about latest Hong Kong protest development.
#antiELABhkpic.twitter.com/wX0ggvGMHy
-
-
-
As the RoP stated very clearly, a bill can be withdrawn by an announcement in Legco. Lam's choice of words "move a motion" of withdrawal in general sense requires debate and division, meaning that the withdrawal can be voted down. This is not needed for a simple withdrawal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Five demands, no one less!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lam is a fraud and a stooge of the CCP. Nothing this woman says should ever be taken at face value.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
四眼仔，成日搞搞震
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2 facts: 1. The number of deaths of protesters cos Hong Kong police is zero. 2. Leaders of the protests, one went to Yale University to study abroad, one went to Australia for a holiday, and one ran to Taiwan to beg for "political asylum."
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.