i get that, and like you I’d also fall in that 53%. But if Sanders brings in a lot of new voters that aren’t guaranteed to go to Dems otherwise and the other candidates aren’t, that’s a strong case for him
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
no, these numbers are useless: https://t.co/kw61aBXzom https://twitter.com/matunos/status/1223831108917198849?s=21 …
-
HOLY MOTHER OF SIGMA...what's so hard about having the same number for each candidate for that question, regardless of how many over all chose a particular??? SHEESH. This is Statistics 101!
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yes, this chart nicely illustrates the Matt Bruenig argument that pragmatism demands that centrists vote for Bernie in order to lock in these voters.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Poll: Yang and Sanders supporters won’t support Warren. Warren people: Blessed unity
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
And also “depends” is way diff than “no”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I mean Trump didn’t attract new votes. He turned out his base. Seems like a winning strategy.
-
He was also fortunate to run against a candidate in the Democratic Party that depressed the Democratic turnout in states like MI, WI, PA, etc.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
And I have been making precisely that argument when this poll popped up on my feed. It's amazing how they keep making arguments which they think will hurt Sanders, only to have the same numbers thrown in their faces as proof positive of the efficacy of our revolution.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.