The more I specifically aim to piss off a demographic that can't help quote rting & responding, the faster my follower count grows. Twitter incentivizes stirring up shit. It's been empirically proven. Bait is polemics, then I reel 'em up to make them learn about Literature.
Try to deflect all you want. You just discovered culture and now parade it around like the new rich bourgeois gentilhomme you are. You larp your culture; you're uneducated, w/ wikipedia knowledge of 90% of what you discuss.
-
-
I've been reading books voraciously since I was a child bub. I first read Homer & Shakespeare in elementary school. Idk what yr trying to say- you have something you want me to know- but you can't quite formulate it. Try harder!
-
Take a look at your 2016 timeline. You were a r/the_donald cuck. You might have read three abridged editions of classics in elementary school, but don't know shit. You treat it like a commodity, just like how you're now bragging about reading Shakespeare in elementary school.
-
Lol what? I still love Trump baybee- & buddy- what exactly do I have to gain here- I just like Literature lol. I always have.
-
You don't like literature for itself, you just want the appearance of it, bourgeois gentilhomme. It's about the "content" - trying to define oneself with images. Like that sappy, self-indulgent and masturbatory pinned tweet of yours.
-
You don't like my poem? Ok. Give me yr best sonnet buddy. We can face off & you can show me what a real literateur looks like.
-
It's not about the poetics of it (I didn't know it was a poem actually), it's saying you're an act, that you use literature and culture as a prop.
-
It's like- sort of true- in that this is a hyperbolic version of my normal life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.