Can everyone agree that the obvious Chesterton Fence here is that normative monogamy was the alternative to Incel cataclysm? ...
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Normative monogamy is not necessary as long as symbolic space can be occupied by the incel. The sexually free Middle Ages and Early Modern Europe offered him a way out, monasteries.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi @Outsideness
The forces of capital foreclose inceldom from the symbolic. It violently reemerges in the real.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @pinkypillz @Outsideness
I don't know how they'd be given a place in a capitalist system, the incel represents the exact opposite of capitalism; the left was quick to jump on the idea that theirs was a fundamentally socio-economic question.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'd rather go with @UntergangMindst's idea: use the LHC to accelerate them into protein powder. The incel will then be consumed by chads. He will become chad muscle, being part of the chad, effectively becoming a chad. It's beautiful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.