Plato was indeed mindfucked by language- thinking words were "conceptual forms"
Is this what you're gonna do? You had ten minutes to come up with a reply. Those are your affirmations, not mine: do you really hold them, yes or no? I'll not argue if you're not convinced of your own positions.
-
-
Plato's forms are said to exist in a "more real" realm beyond perception.
-
Also this was a yes or no question : do you believe that for Plato, "words are forms" and that they exist elsewhere in a "real of forms"?
-
The world of objects "imitates" the forms for Plato. Words, when poetic, imitate objects- he is against this, & points to the "purer" realm
-
>it doesn't >they don't and this isn't why he's against poetry >he's not and he doesn't Wikipedia will not help you on this one, seems like you're gonna have to actually engage with the text.
-
Im not in the mood. You wanted to tell me something- it was nothing.
-
While you're not in the mood, why not use that time away from twitter, to actually read some Plato? It seems like your second-hand knowledge failed you this time.
-
Why don't you actually read McLuhan? I've read Plato. Aristophanes, Homer, Virgil, Ovid etc stick with me more.
-
You haven't read any of those, and if you did, you dragged your eyes across the pages like a ruminant across the grass.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.