Spinoza was a JEW.
But you agree that Spinoza was a jew even though he was also rejected by the jews of the time?
-
-
So Spinoza is your Christ?
-
You aren't fully grasping the importance of the divine nature here. You are doing "historic christ" arguments.
-
The salvific value of the passion relies on Christ's assumption of man, as a jew. Even a calvicuck heretic should know it's the same god as in the AT. It's the god of israel. Israel was widened to the whole earth, but it's still Israel and its god.
-
New Israel, New Testament. Jew takes on a different meaning after this.
-
You still use the Ancient Testament, though, don't you? It sounds pretty jewish to me.
-
It is understood using the cipher of christ
-
So you interpret jewish scriptures with this person of a divine nature (the god of Israel) and a human one (a jew), and it's supposed to be not jewish? Sounds cabalistic. You know that's jewish too, right?
-
Youre doing the neopagan thing. It's Christianity. It is that & not other.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.