red pill on early christian spread plshttps://twitter.com/randall_roark/status/1012343887954837504 …
-
-
Replying to @TerraristLifter
I followed a few classes on early Christianity, in the Religion/Theology dept. of my uni. The believers tended to simply get up and leave. Since Bauer, the Church History taught in universities is almost the opposite of that taught by the Church.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi
Studying the history of Early Christianity is essentially studying movements and forms of belief later termed "heresies" - in most cases the original form of christianity which can be found in a given place, is heretical, even when the Church History mentions apostolic origin.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi @Randall_Roark
Yes, but what became Orthodoxy was far more interesting than most heresies and you can generally evaluate another's intelligence by whether thought they had stumbled on occult knowledge when they first read the Wikipedia page of the Gospel of Thomas.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Thomas literally contains nothing that wouldn't pass as heterodoxy if it was stated in John. Over a third of its sayings are found in the Synoptics. People who push the gnostic reading are edgelords who just want a gnostic text closer to Jesus than the Synoptics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.