This proves nothing about the so-called “postmodern” disciplines and is just shameful, all it does is exploit the willingness of journal reviewers to hear out ideas that someone has, ostensibly, spent a lot of time working onhttps://twitter.com/QuilletteM/status/1047509832499122177 …
-
Show this thread
Replying to @mcrumps
I think (and they seem to realize it too in their article) that the acceptance and/or publication of their papers has more lot to do with reviewers testing papers for methodology and knowledge of prior literature than with said reviewers finding their ideas valid in themselves.
11:05 AM - 3 Oct 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.