Thanks for the response. So if your views are allowed to change, can Paula's not? Should we judge old Alasdair, or new Alasdair?
-
-
Replying to @aboutye1 @PaulaJaneB
Judge every candidate on their platform
#GE2017 Mine is a progressive Pro European & Pro Equality agenda-focused on taking on the Tories/DUP2 replies . 0 retweets 1 like -
Then why are you tweeting
@PaulaJaneB literature from 2010. Was your account hacked?1 reply . 0 retweets 8 likes -
No I stand on my past record & other candidates should do the same in
#GE2017 Paula questioned my progressive stance & I responded1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Make up your mind. Your past record when you were anti-equal marriage or your current platform when you oppose any change to abortion law?
4 replies . 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @naomi_long @AlMcDonnellSB and
I thought abortion was a conscience issue for your party, Naomi? Are you saying you have party members & reps who aren't "progressive"?
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bernardmccabe @AlMcDonnellSB and
Abortion is conscience issue. Stating doctors never get it right with FFA isn't. Harassing women at clinics isn't. Alasdair side-stepping.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @naomi_long @AlMcDonnellSB and
No, in your preceding tweet you implied "opposing any change to abortion law" isn't progressive. Are your pro life voters/reps regressive?
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bernardmccabe @AlMcDonnellSB and
I didn't say that wasn't progressive. I simply stated it was his current position. Read the tweet.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @naomi_long @AlMcDonnellSB and
It's the clear and obvious implication Naomi!
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes
No, it isn't. Read the tweets. I made my objection to Alasdair's stance explicit, so there's no need for conjecture on your part.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.