That is not what your article states. It states that _chkstk catches exceptions. Can you provide a source to that?
Conversation
I did provide a source in the other tweet reply, but here it is again. You will find a lot more in stackoverflow if you simply google it.
1
1
1
I think you are confusing _chkstk from MingwGCC with __chkstk from VC++. Both are different.
1
1
Can you provide some referrence material to back up what you are saying about _chkstk?
1
1
Okay, when I say chkstk catches exception, that is incorrect, I agree. I checked the source code. Will change that in the blog, but it still increases the stack required as a helper function.
1
1
Show replies
Don't waste your energy.... when you steal something, a lack of understanding is expected
1
2
It was actually referenced in our 0.2 release post in May '22 - twitter.com/domchell/statu
Oh, and lets not forget your sock bringing it up in June... twitter.com/domchell/statu
I guess its hard to keep track of your lies when you tell so many 🤷♂️
Quote Tweet
Replying to @rad9800 @NinjaParanoid and @dez_
It's been in NH since 0.1 fwiw as anyone who read the docs would know... Remember that BindShell account that was positively confirmed via mobile number to be @NinjaParanoid back in June? 


