is it b/c of the UX (native) or the ability to “drop out” easily if you lose interest or b/c the interface locks you in as a behavior?
-
-
-
The format forces the author to be clear and concise, with each tweet being a complete point…while most blog posts just fill a page. An entire generation has been trained this way, thanks to pre-smartphone screen constraints and SMS length limits.
-
100% agree. It also helps bad writers hide bad writing, and it feels easier for the writer, since there is minimal narrative to construct.
-
thx guys. i'd love to get opinions here from all 3 of you. i have not done "storms" b/c I feel it would be too imposing on those who follow me, so I've stuck w/ blogging on my site. should i reconsider?
-
My $0.02 is when I want to deep dive a concept/thought - blog; when I have a point I want to pontificate on - tweetstorm. I also use one (storm) to determine if there is interest in a point (your tweet about founder payouts for example) to turn into a post.
-
i tend to blog more than others, say 4-8 times per month. if those were tweetstorms instead, wouldn't doing 8 storms a month be annoying?
-
I don't think so. Part of what makes the Twitter UX work so well is the low cost to sample - if the first tweet isn't interesting, scrolling by is effortless. If 1 in 8 resounds, the other 7 won't even be remembered (in a positive way).
-
totally agree w/ your logic, but... sometimes i feel the topic is sensitive enough where the context of a blog post is required, especially in an environment where people can twist your words
- 2টি আরও উত্তর
নতুন কথা-বার্তা -
লোড হতে বেশ কিছুক্ষণ সময় নিচ্ছে।
টুইটার তার ক্ষমতার বাইরে চলে গেছে বা কোনো সাময়িক সমস্যার সম্মুখীন হয়েছে আবার চেষ্টা করুন বা আরও তথ্যের জন্য টুইটারের স্থিতি দেখুন।