I'm fucking outraged that it's the conservative NYT columnist who's writing about "redistribution of sex" as a fun thought experiment as if he wasn't a reactionary fighting every other society-supporting redistribution of money (duh taxes) "on principle." Not surprised tho.
Also he needs to reread the Srinivasan again because she did not argue for the "redistribution of sex" as a mandate in accordance with incel ideology at alllllll.
-
-
douthat needs to keep amia srinivasan's name out his mouth.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I can't find the part of his piece where he claims that she did. According to him, she says that no one is entitled to such redistribution, but if society weren't so broken, we wouldn't even be thinking about it.pic.twitter.com/BHuwvpF6p5
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.