We have "neoliberal" and "neoconservative". As long as we're making everything "neo", seems like we might as well use "neosocialism" to describe the new Bernie/Corbyn/Morales/Chavez movement...
I honestly don’t get why socialists keep insisting on this. Didn’t corporate pension plans own huge amounts of company stock right up to the 60s? And then when the company went bust, the workers would lose their pensions too?
-
-
Also pension plan ownership of company stock basically entrenched existing management. Shareholders couldn’t throw them out because mgmt could collude with the pension to win votes.
-
I don’t think it’s the end of the world... but it just doesn’t do anything. Maybe that in itself is a reason to implement it .. ie as long as the policy is not too damaging but is popular with your supporters then go ahead and implement.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.