This doesn't work too well for someone who has a net worth of -3k lmao, very good tool though!
-
-
-
Yeah, why does their tool think the minimum net worth of someone is $100? (I mean, I understand the division wouldn't work for negative net worth, but just omitting the possibility seems weird when it applies to so many people!)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm financially fine. Not wealthy. Not struggling (*knock on wood*). The LEAST wealthy person in this article spending $20 MILLION is the equivalent of me spending $38.33. That is mind-shattering.
-
My own net worth is so low all of the comparisons have me spending $0. It doesn't work too well

Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
So basically the examples of mega-rich spending, basically the things and services they bought like houses, newspaper, and campaign ads, are just peanuts to them. Doesn’t even make a dent in their daily lives. Talk about living in different universes.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is amazing. The degree to which these guys use charity to launder their otherwise obscene wealth should be continually highlighted and denigrated, as it is done here. Well done.
-
One question though - was it considered to put in a note about net worth vs. income? My Silicon Valley house makes me look like a baller net worth-wise, but it takes every bit of my liquid income.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don’t want to be more depressed.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.


michelle.lee@washpost.com mlee@aaja.org