Yep yep. Fact checkers at any of the magazines I work for would give me serious side-eye if I offered Wikipedia as a source, heh
-
-
A good idea! For me, Wikipedia works *very* well as a way to quickly figure out the overall shape and jargon of a new subject matter. One can (for a longer, multiply-authored/edited article, at any rate) trust the *general gist* of the article, if not every specific detail.
-
Which is precisely in line with the "best place to start, but never finish there" way of looking at it ...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.